By Robert Rives La Monte, Henry Louis Mencken
Read Online or Download Men versus the man: a correspondence between Robert Rives La Monte, socialist, and H. L. Mencken, individualist PDF
Best conservatism & liberalism books
E-book via Callinicos, Alex
This publication demands a reappraisal of liberalism in diplomacy concept. according to the 1st complete research of the guidelines on diplomacy via David Hume, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek and a brand new standpoint on Adam Smith and diplomacy, the research indicates that classical liberalism differs considerably from other kinds of liberalism, specially by way of the appreciation of the position of strength in international politics.
- Liberalism without Perfection
- The Best Worst President
- America and the New American Century
- Liberalism and Its Critics (Readings in Social and Political Theory)
Additional resources for Men versus the man: a correspondence between Robert Rives La Monte, socialist, and H. L. Mencken, individualist
But one cannot rest on this or any other na turalistic fallacy. Liberals can begin with cruelty as the primary evil only if they go beyond their well -grounded assumption that almost all people fear it and would evade it if they could. If the prohibition of cruelty can be universalized and recognized as a necessary condition of the dignity of persons, then it can become a principle of political morality. This could also be achieved by asking whether the prohi bition would benefit the vast majority of human beings in meeting their known needs and wants .
10 Women, whether or not they also work for pay, continue to perform far more of the unpaid labor of families than men. 1 1 It is equally clear that this has a considerable effect on their success and security in the world of wage-work, on their capacity to be economically self-supporting, and thence on their bargaining power within the family. Thus, the still heavily gendered structure of family life affects the relative positions of men and women in the "public" world outside, which in turn reverberate within the family.
That is why any government must use the threat of punishment, though liberalism looks upon this as an unavoidable evil, to be controlled in its scope and modified by legally enforced rules of fairness, so that arbitrariness not be added to the minimum of fear required for law enforcement. That this formulation owes something to Kant's philosophy of law is evident, but the liberalism of fear does not rest on his or any other moral philosophy in its entirety. 9 It must in fact remain eclectic. What the liberalism of fear owes to Locke is also obvious: that.
Men versus the man: a correspondence between Robert Rives La Monte, socialist, and H. L. Mencken, individualist by Robert Rives La Monte, Henry Louis Mencken