French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day by Raf Geenens, Helena Rosenblatt PDF

By Raf Geenens, Helena Rosenblatt

ISBN-10: 1107017432

ISBN-13: 9781107017436

There's a permanent assumption that the French have by no means been and may by no means be liberal. as with any clichés, this features a grain of fact, however it additionally overlooks a tremendous university of concept that has been a relentless presence in French highbrow and political tradition for almost 3 centuries: French political liberalism. during this collaborative quantity, a special staff of philosophers, political theorists and highbrow historians discover this unjustly missed culture. The chapters research the character and area of expertise of French liberalism, offering a accomplished remedy of significant subject matters together with French liberalism's dating with republicanism, Protestantism, utilitarianism and the human rights culture. person chapters are dedicated to Montesquieu, Tocqueville, Aron, Lefort and Gauchet, in addition to to a couple lesser recognized, but vital thinkers, together with numerous political economists and French-style 'neoliberals'. French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the current Day is key interpreting for all these attracted to the heritage of political notion.

Show description

Read or Download French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day PDF

Similar conservatism & liberalism books

Download PDF by Edwin van de Haar: Classical liberalism and international relations theory:

This booklet demands a reappraisal of liberalism in diplomacy idea. in response to the 1st finished research of the guidelines on diplomacy by way of David Hume, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek and a brand new standpoint on Adam Smith and diplomacy, the research indicates that classical liberalism differs considerably from different kinds of liberalism, specially by way of the appreciation of the position of energy in global politics.

Extra resources for French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day

Sample text

In 1828 he wrote: There are two great drawbacks to avoid in organising a country. Either the whole strength of social organisation is centred on one point, or it is spread over the country. Either alternative has its advantages and its drawbacks. If all is tied into one bundle, and the bundle gets undone, everything falls apart and there is no nation left. 10 9 P. Royer-Collard, ‘De la liberté de la presse’, Discours 2 (January 1822). 10 A. Tocqueville, Journeys to England and Ireland, trans. G.

Efficiency and rationality were its criteria for judging policy proposals. Utilitarianism, like classical economics, took wants as given. It was not interested in the ways in which different types of social organization shape individual wants. Thus, it placed no obvious value on participation as such. Mill imported the themes of self-development and free mœurs from the more sociological tradition of French liberalism. He adapted them to the less historical mode of political argument he had been brought up in.

Tocqueville used these different senses of ‘liberty’ to develop his argument in Democracy in America. What was to be expected from the development of local freedom and flourishing voluntary associations? First of all, the multiplication of political rights would result. Citizens would no longer be passive spectators of the operations of government between periodic national elections. The right to influence the actions of government at all levels – local and regional as well as national – would gradually develop a sense of the citizen’s duty to exercise such rights.

Download PDF sample

French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day by Raf Geenens, Helena Rosenblatt

by William

Rated 4.22 of 5 – based on 13 votes