By Richard P. Hiskes
This publication offers a singular and compelling thesis approximately technological chance, liberalism, and coverage making in liberal societies. against so much theories of danger that target person choice makers and types or rational selection, this ebook argues that dangers has to be obvious as intrinsically either emergent and political phenomena. As such, hazards face up to relief to person actors, occasions, or judgements. to totally comprehend and make coverage for threat, then, it can be crucial to acknowledge that dangers name realization to the connections among participants and occasions, to the ability being exercised within the decision and distribution of dangers, and to how the failure to determine hazards as political, emergent phenomena leads to coverage failure, as in circumstances of "Not in My yard" (NIMBY) controversies.
Liberal societies have specific trouble in dealing with hazard, as a result excessively individualistic political thought and epistemology that undergirds liberalism. therefore, seeing dangers as emergent has dramatic influence at the basic political techniques that make up liberal political conception and function inside liberal societies. The e-book treats particularly the ideas of consent, neighborhood, authority, rights, accountability, id, and political participation. The that means of every of those rules has been altered by means of sleek technological dangers, and dealing with threat would require that liberal societies redefine what those most simple innovations of political ideas are to intend in political perform and coverage making.
Read or Download Democracy, Risk, and Community: Technological Hazards and the Evolution of Liberalism PDF
Similar conservatism & liberalism books
Booklet via Callinicos, Alex
This e-book demands a reappraisal of liberalism in diplomacy thought. in keeping with the 1st entire research of the information on diplomacy by means of David Hume, Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek and a brand new standpoint on Adam Smith and diplomacy, the research indicates that classical liberalism differs considerably from other kinds of liberalism, in particular in terms of the appreciation of the position of energy in global politics.
- Public Choice and the Challenges of Democracy (New Thinking in Political Economy)
- Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice
- Norman Podhoretz and Commentary Magazine: The Rise and Fall of the Neocons
- Liberalism Old and New
- Public Reason and Political Community
- The Paleoconservatives: New Voices of the Old Right
Additional resources for Democracy, Risk, and Community: Technological Hazards and the Evolution of Liberalism
This is the final eradication of human life in the sense of free individuality'—politics as bio-power is completely internalized by every person, making all of life subject to norms that emerge from the nexus of technological growth and scientific knowledge. Obviously, Foucault's discouraging vision of life in technological society is his own and not necessarily shared even by others who with him deny the narrow liberal definition of the scope of the political realm. But what these authors share is a recognition that the effects of modern technology bring individuals together in a way that dramatically affects the public realm as well as the private sphere.
Thus, culture theory ties attitudes about risk to larger aspects of the contemporary mind in an effort to understand the connections between technological risk and a host of societal institutions and group behavior. This refusal to reduce analysis of risk to that of individual behavior is one of the strongest arguments that culture theory makes in its approach to risk. Less successfully however, this theory also denies the validity of other epistemological reductions or assumptions in our understanding of risk.
In the first, he is echoed by William Leiss and Christina Chociolko, who insist that most risks presume the exercise of power by someone else: First, risk means "exposure to the chance of loss"; and second, tor many (but not all) of the risks that we in modern society encounter, our exposure is deliberately induced by sonic social actor in order to realize an incremental net benefit. 49 Even outside the culture theory approach, the role of politics is highlighted by risk analysts adopting a more psychological model, thereby supporting Wynne's political approach in a second sense.
Democracy, Risk, and Community: Technological Hazards and the Evolution of Liberalism by Richard P. Hiskes